Masthead Corporate Logo
Subscribe eNewsletter Magazines

Power Group Online Article

| Add RSS Feed

Coal plant application rejected

10 September 2007 -- The Oklahoma Corporation Commission rejected a request from utilities that they be allowed to move ahead with plans to build a coal-fired power plant in northern Oklahoma. By a 2-1 vote, the regulatory commission turned down the request from Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., American Electric-Power Service Company of Oklahoma and the Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority. The plant was estimated to cost about $1.8 billion.

Chesapeake Energy Corp., which produces natural gas, called on regulators to deny the request, saying natural gas burns cleaner than coal and is in abundance in the region, while the coal would have to be brought in from Wyoming.

Utility officials said the power plant was needed to keep up with growing consumer demand for electricity. They said coal is far less expensive than natural gas, modern coal-fired plants burn much cleaner than older plants and it is best not to rely too heavily on any one power source, such as natural gas.




| Add RSS Feed


 
Return to Previous Page

 
Power Engineering Webcasts




Squeeze More Out of Your Power Plant by Modernizing Your Control System
Original broadcast on
November 20, 2008






Turbine Inlet Cooling with Indirect Evaporation - With Greater Density Comes More Power
Original broadcast on
October 29, 2008






LIVE AT COAL-GEN:
The Real Meaning of 'Carbon Capture Ready'

Original broadcast on
August 14, 2008



More

Sponsored White Papers Library
Recently Added White Papers

Evaluating cogeneration for your facility: A look at the potential energy efficiency, economic and environmental benefits (06/02/2008, Cummins Power Generation)

More
Featured White Papers

Evaluating cogeneration for your facility: A look at the potential energy efficiency, economic and environmental benefits (06/02/2008)

More

 







 


Subscribe eNewsletter Magazines